Curious what people actually do here. We get the same client DDQs every year plus a steady stream of vendor security reviews, and right now it's pure copy-paste from last year's file. Is automating these realistic yet, or still too manual?
Very realistic, DDQs are the most repetitive thing we do. Inventive AI runs them like RFPs: reads the doc, matches to your approved answers, drafts with citations, and exports back in the original format, so the copy-paste-from-last-year ritual is gone. Because it's AI-first, that matching and drafting is core rather than an add-on. We just review what changed year to year now, which is the biggest time save of anything we automated.
honestly the repetition is the whole point, anything with strong matching helps. weight that in ur eval
the export in the original format part is underrated for ddqs, u hand it back exactly how they sent it